• Open Daily: 10am - 10pm
    Alley-side Pickup: 10am - 7pm

    3038 Hennepin Ave Minneapolis, MN
    612-822-4611

Open Daily: 10am - 10pm | Alley-side Pickup: 10am - 7pm
3038 Hennepin Ave Minneapolis, MN
612-822-4611
Tads Vs Conventional Anchorage Methods During Canine Retraction

Tads Vs Conventional Anchorage Methods During Canine Retraction

Paperback

Medical Reference

ISBN10: 6208065569
ISBN13: 9786208065560
Publisher: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing
Published: Sep 20 2024
Pages: 64
Weight: 0.23
Height: 0.15 Width: 6.00 Depth: 9.00
Language: English
Anchorage control is crucial to prevent unwanted tooth movement during space closure. Traditional anchorage devices, such as transpalatal arches and headgear, have limitations like the need for patient compliance and less effective anchorage. This has led to the development of skeletal anchorage devices like Temporary Anchorage Devices (TADs) and miniplates, which offer superior stability, require less patient involvement, and do not affect occlusion.Current evidence shows that mini-implants provide better canine retraction and anchorage control compared to conventional methods.

Also from

Mehta, Ushmita

Also in

Medical Reference