Open Daily: 10am - 10pm | Alley door pickup 10am - 7pm 3038 Hennepin Ave Minneapolis, MN
612-822-4611

  • Open Daily: 10am - 10pm
    Alley-side Pickup: 10am - 7pm

    3038 Hennepin Ave Minneapolis, MN
    612-822-4611

Open Daily: 10am - 10pm | Alley-side Pickup: 10am - 7pm
3038 Hennepin Ave Minneapolis, MN
612-822-4611
Alternative Methods to Standby Gain Scheduling Following Air Data System Failure

Alternative Methods to Standby Gain Scheduling Following Air Data System Failure

Coldsnow, Matthew W.

Paperback

Technology & EngineeringAviation InstructionGeneral Education

ISBN10: 1288414757
ISBN13: 9781288414758
Publisher: Biblioscholar
Published: Dec 7 2012
Pages: 262
Weight: 0.82
Height: 0.55 Width: 6.14 Depth: 9.21
Language: English

The United States Air Force has advanced fighter aircraft that lose the ability to operate in a large portion of their operating flight envelope when an air data system failure is experienced. These aircraft are reverted to a fixed set of standby-gains that limit their maneuverability, degrade handling qualities, and increase susceptibility to departure. The purpose of this research was to determine if three alternative methods of standby-gain-scheduling could provide robust control with minimal performance degradation despite the lack of air data. To accomplish this, three methods of standby-gain-scheduling were developed, integrated, and tested in the Infinity Cube simulator at the Air Force Research Laboratory/RBCD building. The first method improved upon an algorithm which used inertial data to estimate an aircrafts true velocity used to drive the gains in an F-16 controller. This algorithm was validated by post-processing high-fidelity simulator data and actual flight data. The second method simply used inertial velocities to drive the gains in an F-16 controller.

Also in

General Education

View All