• Open Daily: 10am - 10pm
    Alley-side Pickup: 10am - 7pm

    3038 Hennepin Ave Minneapolis, MN
    612-822-4611

Open Daily: 10am - 10pm | Alley-side Pickup: 10am - 7pm
3038 Hennepin Ave Minneapolis, MN
612-822-4611
U.S. Trade Deficit: Causes, Consequences, and Cures: Proceedings of the Twelth Annual Economic Policy Conference of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Lo

U.S. Trade Deficit: Causes, Consequences, and Cures: Proceedings of the Twelth Annual Economic Policy Conference of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Lo

Paperback

EconomicsInvesting & Finance

ISBN10: 9401076383
ISBN13: 9789401076388
Publisher: Springer Nature
Published: Jan 22 2012
Pages: 316
Weight: 1.04
Height: 0.70 Width: 6.14 Depth: 9.21
Language: English
On October 23 and 24, 1987, the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis hosted its twelfth annual economic policy conference, The U.S. Trade Deficit: Causes, Consequences, and Cures. This book contains the papers and comments delivered at that conference. A sharp decline in the value of the dollar against major foreign cur- rencies began in March 1985 and continued through December 1987. Despite this decline, the U.S. trade deficit experienced considerable growth during this time. Many consider the simultaneous occurrence of these two events over so long a period to be a problem requiring a policy response. The conference addresses this issue. Various papers discuss the cause of the trade deficit, the reason for its size and persistence, its relation- ship with other macroeconomic variables, its impact on other industrialized countries, and various policy proposals aimed at reducing the deficit. Session I Peter Hooper and Catherine L. Mann provide an analytical setting for the conference with their The U.S. External Deficit: Its Causes and Persistence. Their observation that the unprecedentedly large U. S. trade imbalance is striking in both its size and its persistence could well be the subtitle of each of the papers presented. The macroeconomic studies, which Hooper and Mann summarize in their review of the existing literature, uniformly conclude that the deficit has not responded to fundamental macroeconomic determinants-relative U.S. income growth and the dollar's exchange rate-in the way that earlier, smaller U.S.

Also in

Economics