Open Daily: 10am - 10pm | Alley door pickup 10am - 7pm 3038 Hennepin Ave Minneapolis, MN
612-822-4611

  • Open Daily: 10am - 10pm
    Alley-side Pickup: 10am - 7pm

    3038 Hennepin Ave Minneapolis, MN
    612-822-4611

Open Daily: 10am - 10pm | Alley-side Pickup: 10am - 7pm
3038 Hennepin Ave Minneapolis, MN
612-822-4611
New methods for generating significance levels from multiply-imputed data

New methods for generating significance levels from multiply-imputed data

Aust, Christine

Paperback

General SociologyProbability & Statistics

ISBN10: 3668674205
ISBN13: 9783668674202
Publisher: Grin Verlag
Published: Apr 20 2018
Pages: 110
Weight: 0.34
Height: 0.26 Width: 5.83 Depth: 8.27
Language: English
Doctoral Thesis / Dissertation from the year 2010 in the subject Mathematics - Statistics, grade: summa cum laude, University of Bamberg (Sozial- und Wirtschaftswissenschaften), language: English, abstract: Missing data are an ubiquitous problem in statistical analyses that has become an important research field in applied statistics. A highly useful technique to handle missing values in many settings is multiple imputation, that was first proposed by Rubin (1977, 1978) and extended in Rubin (1987). Due to the ongoing improvement in computer power in the last 10 years, multiple imputation has become a well known and often used tool in statistical analyses. However, there still exists a problem in generally obtaining significance levels from multiply-imputed data, because the application of multiple imputation requires normally distributed or t-distributed complete-data estimators. Today there are basically three methods that extend the suggestions given in Rubin (1987). First, Li, Raghunathan, and Rubin (1991) proposed a procedure, where significance levels are created by computing a modified Wald-test statistic that is then referred to an F-distribution. This procedure is essentially calibrated and the loss of power due to a finite number of imputations is quite modest in cases likely to occur in practice. But this procedure requires access to the completed-data estimates and their variance-covariance matrices, that may not be available in practice with standard software. Second, Meng and Rubin (1992) proposed a complete-data two-stage-likelihood-ratio-test-based procedure that in large samples is equivalent to the previous one. This procedure requires access to the code for the calculation of the log-likelihood-ratio statistics. Common statistical software does not provide access to the code in their standard analyses routines. Third, Li, Meng, Raghunathan, and Rubin (1991) developed an improved version of a method in Rubin (1987) that only requires the chi-squa

Also in

Probability & Statistics

View All