Open Daily: 10am - 10pm | Alley door pickup 10am - 7pm 3038 Hennepin Ave Minneapolis, MN
612-822-4611

  • Open Daily: 10am - 10pm
    Alley-side Pickup: 10am - 7pm

    3038 Hennepin Ave Minneapolis, MN
    612-822-4611

Open Daily: 10am - 10pm | Alley-side Pickup: 10am - 7pm
3038 Hennepin Ave Minneapolis, MN
612-822-4611
Evaluating Food-for-Work and Cash-for-Work Interventions in Zambia: Programme Effectiveness and Household Livelihood Outcomes

Evaluating Food-for-Work and Cash-for-Work Interventions in Zambia: Programme Effectiveness and Household Livelihood Outcomes

Ngoma, Maliro

Paperback

Careers

ISBN10: 3389179615
ISBN13: 9783389179611
Publisher: Grin Verlag
Published: Feb 15 2026
Pages: 284
Weight: 0.75
Height: 0.64 Width: 5.83 Depth: 8.27
Language: English
Research Paper (postgraduate) from the year 2026 in the subject Guidebooks - School, Education, Pedagogy, course: Education Management and Administration, language: English, abstract: Zambia's rural households face recurrent climate shocks, thin markets, and persistent poverty, which heighten vulnerability and limit productive investment. In this context, work-conditional social protection programmes such as Food-for-Work (FFW) and Cash-for-Work (CFW) aim to stabilise consumption while building community assets. Yet evidence on their comparative effectiveness remains fragmented and sensitive to market conditions, seasonality, and implementation quality. This thesis assesses FFW and CFW in Zambia, examining targeting accuracy, delivery efficiency, asset quality, and cost-effectiveness, alongside impacts on food security, diversification, savings, debt, assets, labour allocation, and subjective well-being. Special attention is given to heterogeneity by market access, timing within agricultural calendars, gender, and shock exposure. A mixed-methods design combines a three-wave household panel with qualitative process data. Propensity score matching and inverse probability weighting construct comparable groups, followed by difference-in-differences and fixed-effects models; instrumental variables address potential endogeneity. Standardised indicators including HDDS, FCS, CSI, PMT scores, and Simpson Index guide measurement. Results show both modalities reduce negative coping and stabilise consumption. CFW yields greater improvements in dietary diversity and flexibility where markets and payment systems function well. FFW performs better in remote areas, during price spikes, and in lean seasons by guaranteeing staple supplies. Timing is critical: pre-lean-season transfers reduce distress sales and improve input access. CFW supports small enterprise entry, savings, and livestock gains; FFW protects schooling, meal frequency, and labour productivity. Both reduce high-in

Also from

Ngoma, Maliro

View All

Also in

Careers

View All