• Open Daily: 10am - 10pm
    Alley-side Pickup: 10am - 7pm

    3038 Hennepin Ave Minneapolis, MN
    612-822-4611

Open Daily: 10am - 10pm | Alley-side Pickup: 10am - 7pm
3038 Hennepin Ave Minneapolis, MN
612-822-4611
Aporetics: Rational Deliberation in the Face of Inconsistency

Aporetics: Rational Deliberation in the Face of Inconsistency

Paperback

PhilosophyLogic

ISBN10: 0822960575
ISBN13: 9780822960577
Publisher: University of Pittsburgh Press
Published: Aug 24 2009
Pages: 176
Weight: 0.52
Height: 0.60 Width: 5.40 Depth: 8.40
Language: English
The word apory stems from the Greek aporia, meaning impasse or perplexing difficulty. In Aporetics, Nicholas Rescher defines an apory as a group of individually plausible but collectively incompatible theses. Rescher examines historic, formulaic, and systematic apories and couples these with aporetic theory from other authors to form this original and comprehensive survey. Citing thinkers from the pre-Socratics through Spinoza, Hegel, and Nicolai Hartmann, he builds a framework for coping with the complexities of divergent theses, and shows in detail how aporetic analysis can be applied to a variety of fields including philosophy, mathematics, linguistics, logic, and intellectual history.


Also in

Philosophy