United States Reports, Supreme Court (Volume 17); Cases Argued and Adjudged in the Supreme Court of the United States
Paperback
Currently unavailable to order
ISBN10: 1150902329
ISBN13: 9781150902321
Publisher: General Books
Pages: 306
Weight: 1.21
Height: 0.64 Width: 7.44 Depth: 9.69
Language: English
ISBN13: 9781150902321
Publisher: General Books
Pages: 306
Weight: 1.21
Height: 0.64 Width: 7.44 Depth: 9.69
Language: English
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1883. Excerpt: ... mencing as early as April, prepared the plans and specifications according to which the Essayons was afterwards built. It is very strange that the copy of General McAlester's letters to the department, and several other important exhibits that were put in evidence, have not been inserted in the record used on this appeal. Where the fault lies, it is not for us to say. Sufficient appears, however, notwithstanding the evidence adduced to the contrary, consisting mostly of the testimony of the complainant himself, to convince us that Brady derived his whole idea from the suggestions of General McAlester; and that the plans for the construction of the Essayons originated entirely with that officer. Our conclusion is, that the patent sued on cannot be sustained, and that the decree of the Circuit Court must be reversed, and the cause remanded with instructions to dismiss the bill of complaint. Decree reversed accordingly. New York Guaranty Company V. Memphis Water Company. 1. An assignee of a chose in action, or any other cestui que trust, cannot, merely on the ground that his interest is an equitable one, proceed in a court of equity to recover his demand. Hayivard v. Andrews, 106 U. 8. 672, cited upon tliis point and approved. 2. The courts of the United States especially, in view of the act of Congress declaring that suits in equity shall not be sustained where there is a plain, adequate, and complete remedy at law, should enforce this rule. 8. Certain parties holding bonds secured by a mortgage filed their bill to reeover moneys alleged to be due on a contract which the city of Memphis made with the mortgagor, and which was assigned in the mortgage as part of the security for the bonds. H4d, that the bill will not lie, the demand against the city bein...
