• Open Daily: 10am - 10pm
    Alley-side Pickup: 10am - 7pm

    3038 Hennepin Ave Minneapolis, MN
    612-822-4611

Open Daily: 10am - 10pm | Alley-side Pickup: 10am - 7pm
3038 Hennepin Ave Minneapolis, MN
612-822-4611
United States Reports (Volume 223); Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court at and Rules Announced at

United States Reports (Volume 223); Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court at and Rules Announced at

Paperback

Currently unavailable to order

ISBN10: 1154132706
ISBN13: 9781154132700
Publisher: General Books
Pages: 270
Weight: 1.07
Height: 0.57 Width: 7.44 Depth: 9.69
Language: English
Book may have numerous typos, missing text, images, or index. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. 1912. Excerpt: ... and conditions under which persons will be licensed to practise osteopathy, does not deprive one who refuses to apply for a license thereunder of his property without due process of law, or deny him the equal protection of the law. Collins v. Texas, 288. 11. Due process of law; effect to deprive, of statute relative to evidence. One is not deprived of his property without due process of law by a statute making entries in public records prima facie, but not con- clusive, evidence, of the validity of the proceedings referred to. Reitler v. Harris, 437. 12. Due process of law; effect of omission of state court as denial of. The refusal of the courts of the State to consider as essential to pro- ceedings to foreclose tax liens certain ministerial duties, the omission of which can in no way affect the rights of the property holder, does not amount to denial of due process of law. Ontario Land Co. v. Wilfong, 543. 13. Due process of law; effect of judgment in proceeding to foreclose tax lien under laws of Washington. The tax laws of the State of Washington involved in this case are clear and simple in their requirements; and the judgment of the Supreme Court of that State attacked in this suit did not deprive plaintiff in error of his property without due process of law. either because of lack of compliance with the statute or of suffi- ciency of notice to the owner or description of the property. (Ontario Land Co. v. Yordy, 212 U. S. 152.) Ib. See Supra, 2; Executive Officers, 2. 14. Equal protection of the law; due process; classification of railroad em- ployes not denial of. A classification of railroad employes, even if including all employes, whether subjected to peculiar hazards incident to operation of trains or not, is not so arbitrary or unequal as to amount to denial of equal pr...