United States Reports (Volume 107); Cases Adjudged in the Supreme Court
Paperback
Currently unavailable to order
ISBN10: 1154417751
ISBN13: 9781154417753
Publisher: General Books
Pages: 330
Weight: 1.30
Height: 0.69 Width: 7.44 Depth: 9.69
Language: English
ISBN13: 9781154417753
Publisher: General Books
Pages: 330
Weight: 1.30
Height: 0.69 Width: 7.44 Depth: 9.69
Language: English
Book may have numerous typos, missing text, images, or index. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. 1883. Excerpt: ... fence. An agent of those interested, including another company having a risk upon the voyage, was sent to Rio Janeiro to ascertain the facts in relation to the loss, and report. In the mean time the suit upon the policy was suffered to remain in the court without being pressed. At the October Term, 1869, the counsel for the plaintiff insisting that something should be done, it was agreed, on behalf of The Ocean Company, that the case should, if possible, be tried at the January Term, 1870. In November, or late in October, 1869, the counsel on the part of The Ocean Company visited New York for the purpose of having a personal interview in respect to the case with the officers of The Sun Company. He there met the then vicepresident of the company. At the interview which then took place, the points of defence that had been previously suggested by the companies having been discussed, the counsel stated that, in his opinion, they could not be sustained by the evidence, but that he intended to make the point that the Rotterdam charter was not included in the risk as described in the policy. He said, however, that he had been informed by the attorneys who conducted the case for the plaintiff they had extrinsic evidence which would establish the liability and which they expected to introduce. This extrinsic evidence he considered inadmissible, but at the same time said that if admitted, the defence to the action would undoubtedly fail. He then informed The Sun Company that upon the presentation of the evidence on the trial he should object to its admission, and he had no doubt the presiding judge, under the practice of that State, would take the advice of the Supreme Court upon that question before proceeding further. If the evidence was ruled out, he expected to succeed in his defen...
