Open Daily: 10am - 10pm | Alley door pickup 10am - 7pm 3038 Hennepin Ave Minneapolis, MN
612-822-4611

  • Open Daily: 10am - 10pm
    Alley-side Pickup: 10am - 7pm

    3038 Hennepin Ave Minneapolis, MN
    612-822-4611

Open Daily: 10am - 10pm | Alley-side Pickup: 10am - 7pm
3038 Hennepin Ave Minneapolis, MN
612-822-4611
Studies in History (Volume 2, No. 1)

Studies in History (Volume 2, No. 1)

College, Smith

Paperback

General World History

Currently unavailable to order

ISBN10: 1234994054
ISBN13: 9781234994051
Publisher: General Books
Pages: 26
Weight: 0.15
Height: 0.05 Width: 7.44 Depth: 9.69
Language: English
This historic book may have numerous typos, missing text or index. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. 1916. Not illustrated. Excerpt: ... CHAPTER II (1) Modern Writers 1 There is no wholly satisfactory account of the Household and Administration under Joachim II and of their later evolution. The best general sketch is perhaps that by Gustav Schmoller,2 but even this is very brief for the sixteenth century, and contains some views which must be rejected. The older accounts of the administrative system under Joachim II by Bornhak, Isaacsohn, and other constitutional historians are also brief; and, inasmuch as they make little or no use of the Household Ordinances and of the Stdndeakten, are antiquated and inaccurate. The historian who has made by far the most valuable contribution to the subject, so far, is the late Martin Hass, in his admirable edition of the Household Ordinance (Hofordnung) of 1537 in 191.0; but his contribution is largely in the form of disconnected notes and commentary to different clauses of the Ordinance. The most adequate and well-rounded intensive study, which has become the starting point for some most recent investigations, is that published by Otto Hintze in 1906.3 Professor Hintze is perhaps the most able and distinguished student of BrandenburgPrussian institutions. His views are accepted almost in toto by Hass. But on the fundamental question of the origin and nature of the Supreme Cameral Tribunal (Kammergericht), and its relation to the Elector's general advisory Council, he holds views which are diametrically opposed to those held by the leading student of Brandenburg legal history and institutions, the venerable jurist, Dr. Adolf Stolzel. Between Hintze and Stolzel a long and stiff polemic has been carried on. No German writers 1 Cf. ch. i, note 1, for the full titles of the works of the authors referred to below. 2 His Introduction to the volume entitled Behord...

Also in

General World History

View All