Open Daily: 10am - 10pm | Alley door pickup 10am - 7pm 3038 Hennepin Ave Minneapolis, MN
612-822-4611

  • Open Daily: 10am - 10pm
    Alley-side Pickup: 10am - 7pm

    3038 Hennepin Ave Minneapolis, MN
    612-822-4611

Open Daily: 10am - 10pm | Alley-side Pickup: 10am - 7pm
3038 Hennepin Ave Minneapolis, MN
612-822-4611
Navy Maintenance: Public/Private Competition for F-14 Aircraft Maintenance: Nsiad-92-143

Navy Maintenance: Public/Private Competition for F-14 Aircraft Maintenance: Nsiad-92-143

U. S. Government Accountability Office (G
U. S. Government Accountability Office (.

Paperback

General Political Science

Publisher Price: $17.75

ISBN10: 1287171761
ISBN13: 9781287171768
Publisher: Bibliogov
Published: May 1 2013
Pages: 54
Weight: 0.25
Height: 0.11 Width: 7.44 Depth: 9.69
Language: English
Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Naval Aviation Depots' (NADEP) airframe repair program, focusing on the: (1) effects of introducing private-sector competition for depot maintenance on F-14 aircraft overhaul costs; (2) Naval Air Systems Command's (NAVAIR) post-award administration of the F-14 competition program; and (3) costs of competed and noncompeted overhauls during the same repair period. GAO found that: (1) F-14 overhaul costs have declined by about 23 percent since the introduction of the competition program, which encourages NADEP to streamline the overhaul process, ensure that only necessary work is performed, and focus on minimizing costs; (2) other factors contributing to cost reductions include accounting changes and aircraft parts funding changes; (3) actual F-14 overhaul costs have exceeded the amounts approved for payment, due to inconsistent contract administration guidance, failure to resolve contract administration problems, contract disputes, problems with the NADEP cost accounting system, and some NADEP inefficiency; (4) NAVAIR has issued new guidance on administering competitive awards won by NADEP; (5) modification of the NADEP cost accounting system to allow better tracking of costs could help to prevent contract disputes; (6) although NADEP applied the same maintenance practices to overhaul work they won under competitive and noncompetitive awards, noncompetitive F-14 overhauls cost about 21 percent more than competitive F-14 overhauls; (7) NAVAIR attributed cost differences to differences in the way the overhauls were administered and cited the positive impact of independent oversight on minimizing costs; and (8) NADEP attributed overhaul cost differences to aircraft age, although noncompetitive overhauls of older aircraft cost more than competitive overhauls of aircraft of the same age.

1 different editions

Also available

Also in

General Political Science

View All