• Open Daily: 10am - 10pm
    Alley-side Pickup: 10am - 7pm

    3038 Hennepin Ave Minneapolis, MN
    612-822-4611

Open Daily: 10am - 10pm | Alley-side Pickup: 10am - 7pm
3038 Hennepin Ave Minneapolis, MN
612-822-4611
Multiscale Modeling, Simulation and Visualization and Their Potential for Future Aerospace Systems

Multiscale Modeling, Simulation and Visualization and Their Potential for Future Aerospace Systems

Paperback

Currently unavailable to order

ISBN10: 1234368811
ISBN13: 9781234368814
Publisher: Books Llc
Pages: 454
Weight: 1.77
Height: 0.92 Width: 7.44 Depth: 9.69
Language: English
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1916 edition. Excerpt: ... until he got free and drove away. II A woman was cooking in her kitchen when her little boy came in and began talking to her. Don't bother me, she said; I'm busy now. He stood still for a minute and watched her as she peeled potatoes and put them in the kettle. Then he begged for something to eat. His mother said he must wait till supper time, but he reached over and took some cake. His mother caught his arm, but he pulled away and ran outside. She started to follow, but just then the kettle boiled over and she had to let him go. son's system of breaking the story up into its details or ideas and counting the number of these that were reproduced in each of the children's accounts. Actually the method was a compromise between using details and simple words as the unit of measurement. For, as it was being graded, the first story seemingly broke up into different units from those arbitrarily chosen at first. Afterwards the stories were regraded in the light of these natural units (natural at least to me) and these second scores are used here. Full credit was given if the actual words were reproduced and half credit for substitutions. Incorrect details which really vitiated the point of the story were correspondingly scored against, but those that could easily have been given as substitutes were not counted one way or the other. Actually, there were only a few such incorrect details to the first story and none in the second. As the second story had been composed so as to include similar elements to those in the first story (such as a direct quotation, a clause not bearing on the main development of the story, etc.) it was easily broken up into units corresponding to those in the first story. These units...