• Open Daily: 10am - 10pm
    Alley-side Pickup: 10am - 7pm

    3038 Hennepin Ave Minneapolis, MN
    612-822-4611

Open Daily: 10am - 10pm | Alley-side Pickup: 10am - 7pm
3038 Hennepin Ave Minneapolis, MN
612-822-4611
Michigan Reports (Volume 150); Cases Decided in the Supreme Court of Michigan

Michigan Reports (Volume 150); Cases Decided in the Supreme Court of Michigan

Paperback

Currently unavailable to order

ISBN10: 1154294099
ISBN13: 9781154294095
Publisher: General Books
Pages: 212
Weight: 0.85
Height: 0.45 Width: 7.44 Depth: 9.69
Language: English
This historic book may have numerous typos, missing text or index. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. 1908. Not illustrated. Excerpt: ... When the taxes for the year 1903 were assessed, the residuum belonged in equal proportions to five Baptist benevolent societies, only one of which, viz., the Baptist Convention of the State of Michigan, was incorporated under the laws of the State of Michigan. Whether such interest of the Baptist Convention was exempt--the interests of the other societies were certainly not exempt--we are not called upon to decide, for it does not appear by this record that such interest was included in the assessment made in 1903. The claim that the taxes for the year 1903 were excessive must therefore be overruled. Late in 1903 there was transferred to said Baptist Convention the interest of the other Baptist benevolent societies in said residuum, and since that time said Baptist Convention has been the owner of the entire residuum. It is contended that the effect of this transfer to a corporation existing under the laws of the State of Michigan was to exempt said entire residuum from taxation under the law above mentioned, and that this residuum was improperly included in the assessment made for the year 1904. If defendants are right in their contention that the residuum is exempt from taxation--and we make this assumption only for the purposes of this decision--the entire credit due from the Dixons was not exempt from taxation, but only so much thereof as represented the value of said residuum. In other words, so much of said credit as would be used in paying expenses of administration, debts, and specific legacies was liable to taxation. Under the theory most favorable to defendants, it was then the duty of the assessing officers to place a valuation on that part of said credit liable to taxation. There is nothing in the record to show that these officers did not endeavor t...