Open Daily: 10am - 10pm | Alley door pickup 10am - 7pm 3038 Hennepin Ave Minneapolis, MN
612-822-4611

  • Open Daily: 10am - 10pm
    Alley-side Pickup: 10am - 7pm

    3038 Hennepin Ave Minneapolis, MN
    612-822-4611

Open Daily: 10am - 10pm | Alley-side Pickup: 10am - 7pm
3038 Hennepin Ave Minneapolis, MN
612-822-4611
Meanest Foundations and Nobler Superstructures: Hooke, Newton and the Compounding of the Celestiall Motions of the Planetts

Meanest Foundations and Nobler Superstructures: Hooke, Newton and the Compounding of the Celestiall Motions of the Planetts

Gal, Ofer

Hardcover

Series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science, Book 229

Sports GeneralAstronomy & SpaceHistory & Philosophy of Science

ISBN10: 1402007329
ISBN13: 9781402007323
Publisher: Springer Nature
Published: Jul 31 2002
Pages: 252
Weight: 1.41
Height: 0.67 Width: 6.24 Depth: 9.86
Language: English
This book is a historical-epistemological study of one of the most consequential breakthroughs in the history of celestial mechanics: Robert Hooke's (1635-1703) proposal to compoun[d] the celestial motions of the planets of a direct motion by the tangent & an attractive motion towards a centrat body (Newton, The Correspondence li, 297. Henceforth: Correspondence). This is the challenge Hooke presented to Isaac Newton (1642-1727) in a short but intense correspondence in the winter of 1679-80, which set Newton on course for his 1687 Principia, transforming the very concept of the planetary heavens in the process (Herivel, 301: De Motu, Version III). 1 It is difficult to overstate the novelty of Hooke 's Programme - The celestial motions, it suggested, those proverbial symbols of stability and immutability, werein fact a process of continuous change: a deflection of the planets from original rectilinear paths by a centraU attractive power (Correspondence, li, 313). There was nothing necessary or essential in the shape of planetary orbits. Already known to be not circular nor concentricall (ibid. ), Hooke claimed that these apparently closed curve Line[ s ] should be understood and calculated as mere effects of rectilinear motions and rectilinear attraction. And as Newton was quick to realize, this also implied that the planets neither move exactly in ellipse nor revolve twice in the same orbit, so that there are as many orbits to a planet as it has revolutions (Herivel, 301: De Motu, Version III).

1 different editions

Also available

Also in

Astronomy & Space

View All