Madras Legal Companion (Volume 2); 1903-06

Questo libro di storia potrebbe contenere numerosi refusi e parti di testo mancanti. Solitamente gli acquirenti hanno la possibilita di scaricare gratuitamente una copia scansionata del libro originale (senza refusi) direttamente dall'editore. Il libro e Non illustrato. 1903 edition. Estratto: ...and Chtekal' Zemindar v Hana sour Mora 1 2a Ma'I. 318 ieferred to as explaining the mutual relationship and lights of the ivots and the Zemindar and iis showing that the lights of the ryots arose not under any letting by Zemindars, but independently of them. Hangayi/a v. Kadiyala Hat nam, IL B. 13 Mid. 249 aid Xppa Rat v. Xara.anna, I. L. B. 15 Mad. 47 distinguished as being, cases of short leases deriving li'tle from the Zemii.dar and not of eases of permanent ocerpanoy rights. Civil. Chathoth Kunhi T. Saidinda vide Kunhamimd, I. L. R. 26 Mad. 258. Civil Procedure Code (Act XIV of 1882). Sec 223 and 33f, . Rights of transferee decree.holder for execution against the surety under Section: ib Original decree-holder applied and obtained an order for execution against a surety under Sec. 336 on failure of the judgment-debtor to apply to be declared an insolvent. That execution proved infructuous. Application was than made by transferee of the decree to recognise the assignment and send the decree for execution to another court. The order of the Judge was: --Recognise and send but not as against the third defendant the surety under Sec. 336. Held. That when once the decree has been orderd to be executed against the surety, the transferee decree-holder is t ntitled to have his decree sent for execution against the surety also. Civil. Pichuvayeugar v. Oliver, I. L. R. 26' Mad. 260. Rent Recovery Act (VIII of 1865) Sec. 14. Demand of excess amount--Attachment and sal Illegality. A land holder made a demand on his tenant for payment of Rs. 52-9-5. The tenant did not comply with the demand and his land was in consequence attached and sold. The tenant then sued for a...