
Cases Argued and Decided in the Supreme Court of Mississippi (121)
Paperback
Currently unavailable to order
ISBN10: 1153942127
ISBN13: 9781153942126
Publisher: General Books
Pages: 582
Weight: 1.86
Height: 1.29 Width: 9.01 Depth: 5.98
Language: English
ISBN13: 9781153942126
Publisher: General Books
Pages: 582
Weight: 1.86
Height: 1.29 Width: 9.01 Depth: 5.98
Language: English
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1920 Excerpt: ...circuit court of Hinds county against the defendant, Mercantile Lumber Company, for damages for personal injuries. The declaration, in. short, alleges that the lumber company violated the ten-hour labor law in his case by permitting him to work all day and all night. This law is found in chapter 239 of the Laws of 1916, sections 4523 and 4524, Hemingway's Code, and in part provides that: It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation engaged in manufacturing or repairing, to work their employees more than ten hours per day, except in cases of emergency, or where the public necessity requires in such departments. The declaration negatives the necessity or emergency requiring the plaintiff to work for over ten hours. The duties of the plaintiff and the manner in which he sustained his injuries are thus alleged in the declaration: That the particular duty of the plaintiff that night was to climb up into a car of lumber and hand out pieces of lumber therein to fellow employees on said platform, who loaded same on two-wheel carts and rolled it to the planing machinery near by for immediate planing, and who immediately returned with other empty cars for more lumber from the car for planing, the same as in the daytime. That plaintiff before said hour of 4 o'clock a. m. had grown very weary, fatigued, sleepy, and listless as the result of his many continuous hours of labor and lack of rest and sleep as aforesaid; and about said hour of 4 o'clock a. m., plaintiff and his fellow employees having just finished unloading a car of lumber, plaintiff, as was his duty as said employee of defendant, climbed up into another car of lumber which was next to be unloaded, prepara121 Miss. Opinion of the court. tory to unloading the same by the time hi...