The Aphorisms of the Nyya Philosophy

This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1853 edition. Excerpt: ...of the Veda Aph. 59.--There is no inconsistency asserte though you might allege the charge in res pect of a different time from that which was intended. a. Supply-- there is no self-destructiveness.t b. There is no self-destructiveness implied in the two app-rentjy contradictory injunctions, though you might allege the charge aforesaid if, at the time of taking the fire, having intended, i. e., having agreed upon, the sacrifice after sunrise, for e-ample, one were to perform the sacrifi.ce before sunrise, or the like: --such is the meaning. C. He repels the charge of tautology. 'v N J PTTOrrer II x II The Veda denied to be Aph. 60.--And--the Veda, is not charge-, m, oogici. je tautology, though things are re-iterted in it--snce re-inculcation is suitable. a. The ' and here has the sense of again. ' Since re-inculcation is suitable/ again, there is no tautology. For it is when there is no motive for the reiteration that reiteration is a, fault. II J i. fie declares that the utility of re-iaculcation is a settled point in the world. R ik inculcation A/ph. 61.--And because the utility is admitted Hot needless. diyision rf.discourse. a. ' Because the utility is admitted/ i. e., because it is agreed, 1--supply by the learned,--that there is a motive, --' of this division of discourse/ i. e., of discourse divided from the other species of discourse by the character of re-inculcation. For the learned having divided discourse according to the distinctions of enactive, re-inculcative, &c., hold that the re-inculcative also has its reasons. So is it in the case of the Veda: --such is the import.t b. He shows the division of discourse in the case of the Veda.% II II Discourie Aph. 63.--Because speech is distributed into in-e-junction, ...