• Open Daily: 10am - 10pm
    Alley-side Pickup: 10am - 7pm

    3038 Hennepin Ave Minneapolis, MN
    612-822-4611

Open Daily: 10am - 10pm | Alley-side Pickup: 10am - 7pm
3038 Hennepin Ave Minneapolis, MN
612-822-4611
Acceptability of Corrective Action Programs for Fuel Cycle Facilities: Draft Report for Comments

Acceptability of Corrective Action Programs for Fuel Cycle Facilities: Draft Report for Comments

Paperback

General Science

ISBN10: 1499629273
ISBN13: 9781499629279
Publisher: Createspace
Published: May 20 2014
Pages: 34
Weight: 0.23
Height: 0.07 Width: 8.50 Depth: 11.02
Language: English
In the staff requirements memorandum (SRM) for SECY-10-0031, Revising the Fuel Cycle Oversight Process, dated August 4, 2010 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML102170054), the Commission directed the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff to consider how the NRC Enforcement Policy could best reflect that most fuel cycle licensees have voluntarily developed corrective action programs (CAPs). In response to the Commission's direction, the staff revised the NRC Enforcement Policy to disposition Severity Level IV violations as noncited violations if the NRC determines that the licensee's CAP is effective, the licensee enters the violation in its CAP, and other criteria are met, as delineated in Section 2.3.2 of the NRC Enforcement Policy (ADAMS Accession No. ML12340A295). In SRM-SECY-11-0140, Enhancements to the Fuel Cycle Oversight Process, dated January 5, 2012 (ADAMS Accession No. ML120050322), the Commission directed staff to proceed with the development and implementation of the incentives for licensees to maintain an effective CAP.

Also in

General Science